The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has criticized Bayo Onanuga, special adviser on strategy and information, calling him a “historical loose cannon” who often contradicts himself. HURIWA argues that Onanuga lacks the qualifications to represent a Nigerian president, especially if the aim is to silence criticism and critical thinking.
HURIWA also condemned Onanuga for his misinterpretation of a recent cover story in The Guardian, which highlighted the severe issues of hunger, poverty, and living costs in Nigeria. The association noted that Onanuga’s failure to accurately reflect the article’s content suggests a lack of thoughtful consideration in his public statements. They defended The Guardian as a reputable media outlet and accused Onanuga of distorting a narrative that reflects the real struggles of Nigerians, rather than endorsing any calls for military intervention.
Additionally, HURIWA pointed out a statement by Senate President Godswill Akpabio, who reportedly told protesting youths that he would be “inside his mansion” watching the protests on television, highlighting a disconnect with the public.
The organization criticized Onanuga for justifying the disobedience of court orders by former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, asserting that Onanuga’s defense of Bello’s actions undermines the rule of law. HURIWA emphasized that immunity does not protect individuals from arrest if they are wanted by law enforcement, regardless of their status.
“We urge President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to appoint a more qualified and thoughtful spokesperson,” HURIWA stated. They expressed concern that Onanuga’s remarks create the impression that government officials can evade justice by hiding in their official residences.
HURIWA recalled Onanuga’s comments on why law enforcement has not arrested Bello, who is wanted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for alleged financial crimes. They dismissed Onanuga’s claims that the situation is “complicated” due to the immunity enjoyed by governors.
In conclusion, HURIWA argued that the constitutional provisions of immunity do not transform government houses into sanctuaries for fugitives and asserted that the law must be upheld without exception.